摘 要

英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………… Ⅲ

1. 监察制度改革对检察机关侦查权的影响分析…………………………… 1

（一）监察制度改革……………………………………………………………… 1

（二）改革对检察机关侦查权的影响…………………………………………… 1

1.改革对检察机关侦查权的范围的影响…………………………………………1

2.改革对检察机关侦查权的启动方式的影响……………………………………2

3.改革对检察机关侦查权的行使程序之影响……………………………………2

二、检察机关侦查权重构之必要性和可行性……………………………………3

（一）检察机关侦查权重构的必要性……………………………………………3

（二）检察机关侦查权重构的可行性……………………………………………4

1.检察机关的性质：法律监督机关………………………………………………4

2.检察机关具备侦查能力…………………………………………………………5

3.廉政公署的经验…………………………………………………………………5

三、新构检察侦查权之内容………………………………………………………7

（一）自行侦查权的重构…………………………………………………………7

1.检察院应保留自行侦查权………………………………………………………7

2.检察院可以启动自行侦查的情况………………………………………………8

（二）补充侦查权之重构………………………………………………………9

1.应保留检察院的补充侦查权……………………………………………………9

2.补充侦查权的适用………………………………………………………………10

（三）机动侦查权之重构………………………………………………………11

1.检察机关不必保留机动侦查权…………………………………………………11

2.不保留机动侦查权的依据………………………………………………………11

四、结语………………………………………………………………………………13

参考文献………………………………………………………………………………14

致谢…………………………………………………………………………………15

监察制度改革背景下检察权重构之侦查权

摘 要

监察制度改革背景下，监察委员会将作为反腐败的专门机构享有职务犯罪的调查权，其实质是代替了检察机关原有的职务犯罪侦查权。因此本文讨论的焦点问题是检察机关职权中的侦查权如何重新配置。改革并不动摇检察机关作为唯一法律监督机关的地位，对诉讼活动的监督仍是其重要职权。将职务犯罪的侦查权转隶至监察委员会的同时，检察机关应该保留其在特殊情况下的自行侦查权，保留原有的补充侦查权。而原有的机动侦查权一直存在许多启动和适用上的问题，可以在改革中不再保留。改革过程中应重视检察机关的作用而不能采取贬低态度，否则，既可能对检察机关顺利开展诉讼监督产生不利影响，又会削弱检察机关的宪法法律定位，甚至会影响整个法治进程的健康发展。

关键词： 监察制度改革 检察机关 侦查权

The reconstructing of Prosecutor’s power of investigation under the background of supervision system reform

Abstract

Under the background of the reform of the supervisory system, The Supervisory Committee will serve as a specialized agency that have the right to investigate the job-related crimes , which in essence replaces the power of investigating these kinds of crimes .The power belong to the procurator before this reform. Therefore, this article discusses how to reconfigure the investigative power of the procurator.The reform does not destabilize the fact that the procurator is the sole legal supervisory authority and the procurator still pay more attention to the supervision of litigation activities. While the investigative power of job-related crimes has been transferring to The Supervisory Committee, the procurator should retain its own right of investigation in exceptional circumstances and retain the original right of supplementary investigation. However, the original right of flexible investigation has many problems in its initiation and application, I think it can no longer be retained in the reform. In the process of reform, the role of the procurator should be taken into account and we should not adopt a degrading attitude to it.This view will decrease the constitutional status of prosecutors.If we underrate the role of procurator,it will not play the role of litigation supervision and even have bad effect on the development of the whole process of the rule of law.

一、监察制度改革对检察机关侦查权的影响分析