摘 要

ABSTRACT 4

1绪论 5

2 外国政府信息公开制度的概述 6

2.1 外国政府信息公开制度中具有代表性的法律 6

2.2上述国家法律制度的主要特点 8

3 外国政府信息公开法的法条分析 9

3.1信息公开法的宪法基础 9

3.2信息公开的范围 9

3.3信息公开的程序 12

3.4信息公开的救济方式 13

4 中国政府信息公开制度的立法沿革与现状、问题 17

4.1 我国信息公开制度的发展历程 17

4.2 中国政府信息公开制度构建的困境 18

4.2.1知情权缺乏宪法基础 18

4.2.2 公开程序上存在问题 18

4.2.3公开范围规定模糊 19

4.2.4 救济方式缺乏 20

5 外国政府信息公开制度对我国建设政府信息公开制度的启示 21

5.1 在宪法层面明确公民知情权 21

5.2 明确信息公开法的公开范围 21

5.3 明确公开程序 22

5.4 完善救济制度 23

结论 24

参考文献 25

致谢 26

摘 要

随着我国依法治国的不断推进，政府信息公开已经成为了法制建设过程中必须予以完善的重要部分。因此，借鉴学习外国先进的政府信息公开制度，改进我国目前法律存在的漏洞是一个明智的选择。本文由绪论和三个部分组成: 采用比较分析等方法,通过分别分析我国政府信息公开制度和外国政府信息公开制度，了解了我国政府信息公开制度的现状问题和外国政府信息公开制度的相比较之下值得学习之处，进而得出外国政府信息公开制度对我国的启示。

在绪论部分,主要讨论政府信息公开制度存在的必要性和研究政府信息公开立法的意义,明确论文的价值所在,说明本文的写作目的和写作所用方法技巧;

第一章围绕着瑞典、美国、英国、日本等国家的政府信息公开制度展开,讨论了这些国家的立法实践过程，以及这些国家政府信息公开立法的特点。从这些国家的立法原则，信息公开技术，救济方式等方面讨论了这些国家的立法对我们的重要启示。

第二章论述了我国近些年来政府信息公开立法的成果和存在的问题,提出虽然近年来立法的速度在不断地加快，相关法律法律的设置也越来越完善，但是在根本上仍然存在着诸如：救济手段缺乏，公开和不公开的信息种类的划分模糊，政府信息公开观念缺乏等缺点。

第三章基于前两章的内容对外国政府信息公开制度的先进之处的讨论，以及对我国现存的政府信息公开制度存在的缺点的分析。从而得出了，外国政府信息公开方面实践的经验对我国信息公开立法和制度建立的启示。这些启示包括：培养政府公务人员的信息公开意识；促进公民积极行使知情权；及时完善政府信息立法；改进政府信息公开的方式等方面提出了进一步完善我国政府信息公开法律制度的建议。

关键词：政府信息公开法；启示；知情权

ABSTRACT

With the development of the “rule of law” policy in China, the public information disclosure has become an important part of the legal construction process. Therefore, it is a wise choice to learn from the public system of foreign advanced government information and improve the loopholes in our current law. This paper consists of introduction and three parts: the methods of comparative analysis, through analysis our country government information publicity system and foreign government information publicity system, understand the present situation of our country government information publicity system problems and by comparison of foreign government information disclosure system is worth learning, and it is concluded that foreign enlightenment to our country government information publicity system.

In the introduction part, mainly discuss the necessity of the government information publicity system and research significance of government information legislation, clear of the value of the paper, the method used to explain the purpose of writing this article and writing skills;

The first chapter around Sweden, the United States, Britain, Japan and other countries of government information publicity system, discusses the legislative practice in these countries, as well as the characteristics of government information disclosure legislation in these countries. From the legislative principles of these countries, the open technology of information and the way of relief, the important revelation of the legislation of these countries is discussed.

The second chapter discusses the achievements in recent years in our country government information publicity legislation and existing problems, and put forward though legislation accelerated constantly in recent years, the related law laws set is becoming more and more perfect, but essentially still exist such as: the lack of relief measures, the division of the types of information open and closed fuzzy, the lack of the concept of government information publicity.

The third chapter is based on the content of the first two chapters on foreign government information disclosure system the advanced parts of the discussion, as well as to the disadvantages of the government information disclosure system of our country's existing analysis. It is concluded that the experience of foreign government information disclosure is a revelation to China's information disclosure legislation and system. These Revelations include the public awareness of information about government officials; To promote the active exercise of the right of informed citizens; To improve government information legislation in time; This paper puts forward some Suggestions to further improve the public legal system of government information in China.