论文总字数：14390字

摘 要

非法捕捞水产品罪作为一种环境犯罪，可以通过刑事附带民事公益诉讼追究行为人的刑事和民事责任。但刑附民公益诉讼司法程序复杂，案件办理周期长，见效慢，而且在司法实践中还存在着量刑标准不一、打击力度不强、行政部门后续执行监管不严的现象，导致该罪重复犯罪率高、被破坏的生态环境得不到有效修复，不能达到打击犯罪、保护生态环境的立法效果。在认罪认罚从宽制度迅速发展的背景之下，结合非法捕捞水产品案件办案现状，提出“认罪认罚认赔”办案模式。在量刑上，推动认罪认罚制度，增加“认赔”环节，使犯罪行为人遭受经济损失，并将“认赔”作为量刑情节；在刑罚执行上，将自愿认赔的费用作为渔业资源修复费用，专款专用于修复被破坏水域生态环境。“认罪认罚认赔”办案模式贯穿非法捕捞水产品案件办案的全过程，能够弥补刑事立法的不足，更好地打击违法犯罪，推动生态环境保护和修复，维护国家生态环境的管理制度，更好地保护生态资源，维持生态平衡，促进生态可持续发展。而且，该模式不仅能够适用于非法捕捞水产品罪刑事案件，还能够适用于其他环境类犯罪，例如环境污染犯罪、滥伐林木罪，应用前景非常广阔。

关键词 ：非法捕捞水产品 认罪认罚认赔 量刑 执行 生态修复Discussing the penalty and execution of the crime of illegal fishing from the “confessing guilty,punishment and compensation”

Abstract

As an environmental crime, the crime of illegally fishing an be investigated for criminal and civil liability of the perpetrator through a criminal public interest civil action. However, the judicial procedures for public welfare litigation of criminal penalties are complicated, the case processing cycle is long, and the effect is slow,and the courts have different sentencing standards for the crime of illegal fishing, the intensity of the crackdown is not strong, and the follow-up supervision of the administrative departments is not strict,which causes the crime has a high repeat crime rate and the ecological environment damages ,and it cannot achieve the effect of combating crime and protecting the ecological environment.It put forward “confessing guilt, punishment and compensation” aimed at the crime of illegal fishing.In terms of sentencing, promote the implementation of the pleading guilty and punishment,and "confessing compensation" is taken as the sentencing plot; In the implementation, the cost of compensation is used for repairing fishery resources. The "confessing guilty, punishment and compensation" runs through the entire process of handling criminal cases of illegal fishing,which can make up for the lack of criminal legislation, better fight against illegal crimes, promote ecological environmental protection and repair, maintain the ecological management system, protect ecological resources better, maintain ecological balance, and promote ecological sustainable development.

Key Words: Illegal fishing; Confessing guilty, punishment and compensation; Sentencing; Execution; Ecological restoration

目录

中文摘要 I

英文摘要 II

引言 1

一、非法捕捞水产品罪在刑罚与执行存在的问题 1

（一）法律适用难，入罪标准不统一 1

1.对于“禁渔区”、“禁渔期”和“禁用的工具和方法”专有名词的解释和认定存在争议 1

2.对“情节严重”难以界定 2

（二）刑事责任实现不足，打击力度不够 3

（三）监管执行不到位，生态环境问题难以解决 4

二、“认罪认罚认赔”模式 4

（一）“认罪认罚认赔”的概念 5

（二）“认罪认罚认赔”机制的创新性 5

（三）“认罪认罚认赔”模式与传统刑事诉讼程序 6

三、“认罪认罚认赔”适用于非法捕捞水产品罪的必要性 7

（一）有助于节约司法资源，提高诉讼效率 7

（二）促进量刑合理化，降低重复犯罪率 8

（三）促进生态环境的有效恢复 8

（四）推进行政执法与刑事司法相衔接 8

四、“认罪认罚认赔”在非法捕捞水产品罪适用的建议 9

（一）完善非法捕捞法律法规制度建设 9

(二)“认罪认罚认赔”模式贯穿案件办理全过程 9

1.侦查阶段 9

2.审查起诉阶段 10

3.庭审阶段 10

4.执行阶段 10

（三）完善非法捕捞案件办理工作布局 10

（四）发挥刑事附带民事公益诉讼制度的积极作用 11

结语 12

参考文献 13

致谢 15

引言

请支付后下载全文，论文总字数：14390字