论文总字数：24977字

摘 要

随着法治化进程的不断推进，社会经济的飞速发展，以及互联网在全球范围内的普及，大量新型违法犯罪行为层出不穷，这在无形中扩大了行政执法和刑事司法所调整领域的交叉范围，产生了行政执法与刑事司法衔接和竞合的现实基础，从而也对二者在适用过程中所运用的方法与技术提出了更高的要求。在行政执法和刑事司法这两个不同的执法体系中，各有较为重要的制裁形式，即行政罚和刑罚。而行政处罚权与刑罚权作用的范围不清，主要原因在于国家权力在行政和司法二者间的划分存在较多问题。尽管近几年我国的刑事司法和行政执法的竞合适用以及衔接制度研究已经取得了一定的成效，但时至今日，在两法的竞合适用以及衔接过程中“以罚代刑”、“以刑代罚”、“四多四少”等问题依旧屡见叠出。本文主要采用观察法、文献研究法查阅相关资料，对比现有法条以及学者的理论，从现实案例入手，分析我国行政罚与刑罚衔接的制度以及实践现状，并研究行政罚和刑罚在裁定程序以及执行程序上的衔接情况和存在的问题，探索行政罚与刑罚折抵的条件和限制，最后针对上述问题提出完善建议，希望能为我国的行政罚与刑罚协调适用的实践提供帮助。

关键词：行政罚 刑罚 裁决程序 执行程序 过罚相当

Research on the Coordination of Administrative penalty and criminal penalty Application

Abstract

With the continuous advancement of the process of the rule of law and the rapid development of the social economy and the popularity of the Internet in the world, a large number of new types of illegal and criminal activities continue to emerge. This has virtually expanded the scope of cross-disciplinary adjustments in administrative law enforcement and criminal justice. The realistic basis for the convergence and competition between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice is also put forward, and thus more stringent requirements are imposed on the methods and technologies used in the application process. In the two different law enforcement systems of administrative law enforcement and criminal justice, there are relatively important forms of sanctions, namely, administrative punishments and penalties. The scope of the effects of the power of administrative penalty and the power of criminal penalty is unclear. The main reason is that there is a huge problem in the division of state power between the administration and the judiciary. Although in recent years China’s criminal justice and administrative law enforcement have achieved certain results in terms of competing suitability and research on the convergence system, but up to now, in the course of the competition and suitability of the two laws and the convergence process, “penalties for punishment” have been used. "Penalty on a penalty basis" and "four more and four less" are still common problems. This article mainly uses the observation method and the literature research method to review the relevant data, comparing the existing law and scholars' famous theories. This article starts from the introduction, analyzing the administrative penalty and the applicable system of penalties in China. It also studies the current status of the practice of the administrative penalty and the criminal penalty in the ruling. In addition, this article also studies the conditions and problems of competition in the procedures and execution procedures, including the exploration of conditions and limitations of administrative penalties and penalties for compensation. Finally this article shows the solution to the above problems and suggestions for improvement with the hope that it can be applied to our country’s administrative penalty and coordination of penalties and provide great help.

Key words: Administrative penalty ;Criminal penalty; Adjudication procedure；Executive program；Punishment equals fault

目 录

摘要 I

Abstract II

一、引言 1

二、行政罚与刑罚衔接的现状和必要性分析 2

（一）行政罚与刑罚衔接的现状 2

1.行政罚与刑罚衔接的概念 2

2.行政罚与刑罚衔接的特征 4

3.行政罚与刑罚衔接的立法现状 5

4.行政罚与刑罚衔接的执法现状 7

（二）行政罚与刑罚衔接的必要性 9

1.行政罚与刑罚的关系 9

2.两法衔接机制设立目的 10

3.行政罚与刑罚衔接机制的理论基础 10

4.行政罚与刑罚衔接的实践意义 11

三、行政罚与刑罚裁决中的衔接 12

（一）行政罚与刑罚裁决中的衔接的立法现状 12

1.适用范围的确立 12

2.案件移送情形的明晰 12

3.证据转化制度的设计 13

（二）行政罚与刑罚裁决中的衔接的执法现状 14

1.移送刑事立案案件数量少 14

2.移送刑事立案案件质量不高 15

（三）行政罚与刑罚裁决中的衔接机制的完善构想 16

1.明确法律地位，提升立法位阶 16

2.统一移送标准，明确证据要求 16

3.建立信息共享制度，实现信息公开透明 16

4.完善联席会议制度 17

5.发挥公安、检察机关提前介入作用 17

6.建立科学的考评机制，严格责任追究制度 17

四、行政罚与刑罚执行中的衔接 19

（一）行政罚与刑罚执行中的衔接的立法现状 19

1.协调处罚轻重 19

2.提出处罚折抵要求 20

3.规定在行为人被免于刑罚处罚时行政罚仍可适用 21

4.确立某种情况下行政罚和刑罚可以并科 21

（二）行政罚与刑罚执行中的衔接的实践现状 21

（三）行政罚与刑罚执行中的衔接机制的完善构想 22

1.完善立法 22

2.细化和明确规定衔接机制的相关立法内容 23

3.整合现有立法资源 24

4.建立新的检查监督体系 24

结语 25

参考文献 26

致谢 28

请支付后下载全文，论文总字数：24977字