摘 要

反垄断法有着“经济宪法”和“企业自由大宪章”美称，为维护市场经济健康稳定的发展扮演着重要的角色，它是维护市场经济的自由竞争和社会公平的法律依据，为国家经济现代化稳定发展发挥了至关重要的作用，在保护受害人合法权益和打击垄断行为方面，发挥着无可替代的作用。

我国首部《反垄断法》自2008年8月1日起开始正式实施，反垄断法的相关法律规定也为反垄断法引入民事诉讼制度提供了基本框架，可是我国的《反垄断法》对是否可以因垄断行为提起民事诉讼的法律规定不够清晰，导致在反垄断法民事诉讼的司法实践中遇到很多现实的阻碍，所以有许多不足有待改进的地方。从反垄断法的问世和发展的历程来看，西方发达国家拥有非常成功的经验，其具体的措施就是在反垄断法实施中设立私人诉讼制度。西方国家在私人反垄断法上的成功经验值得我国借鉴，完善我国反垄断法民事诉讼制度亟须要像西方发达国家的反垄断法这样一个参照蓝本。本文以反垄断法实施中的问题为起点，为我国反垄断法的完善和改进提出有关建议。

本文在分析了我国反垄断法实施中的问题，借鉴西方发达国家在反垄断法民事诉讼制度上立法的成功经验，讨论了完善我国反垄断法民事诉讼制度的社会意义，建议我国在改进反垄断民事诉讼立法中应当坚持以维护消费者利益为立法的价值导向，坚持以维护社会公平为原则，照顾原告的弱势地位，完善民事诉讼等举措，维护消费者的合法利益和社会公共利益，促进社会公平。全文结构如下：

第1章为绪论。该章首先介绍了本文的选题背景及意义，然后对国内外学者有关反垄断法民事诉讼制度的研究成果进行了综述，同时介绍了本文的主要内容及研究方法，最后简要的介绍了本文的创新之处与存在的不足。

第2章为我国改进和完善反垄断民事诉讼的合理性和紧迫性。该章在总结法律传统和当前反垄断法实施中的实际情况，分析了我国完善反垄断法民事诉讼的合理性和紧迫性。

第3章为我国反垄断民事诉讼的应该坚持的价值导向。首先论述了公平竞争是市场经济的基本原则，反垄断法民事诉讼立法的出发点要坚持公平的原则，同时论述了反垄断法民事诉讼的价值目标还应该是提高经济的整体效益和维护消费者的利益。

第4章为反垄断民事诉讼主体问题。本部分包括原告资格的认定、公益诉讼、反垄断集团诉讼三个方面，在分析我国在反垄断法实施中的现实情况，借鉴西方发达国家反垄断法民事诉讼的成功经验，对我国反垄断法民事诉讼的完善提出建议。

第5章为反垄断民事诉讼中的举证责任分担。本部分讨论了在司法实践中反垄断案件的举证原则和法律适用，同时讨论了反垄断法民事诉讼举证责任的例外对减轻原告的负担具有重要意义。

第6章为反垄断法民事诉讼的援助费用问题。该部分对援助费用的可行性进行了分析，并对反垄断法诉讼引入援助费用提出有关对策。

关键词：反垄断 反垄断法实施 民事诉讼 集团诉讼

Abstract

The Anti-monopoly Law, which has the title of "Economic Constitution" and "Magna Carta of Enterprise Freedom", plays an important role in maintaining the healthy and stable development of the market economy, and it is the legal basis for safeguarding the free competition and social fairness of the market economy. It plays an irreplaceable role in protecting the legal rights and interests of the victims and cracking down on monopoly behavior.

The first anti-monopoly law in China has been implemented since August 1, 2008. The relevant legal provisions of the anti-monopoly law also provide a basic framework for the introduction of the civil litigation system into the anti-monopoly law. However, the anti-monopoly law of our country is not clear enough about whether the civil action can be brought because of monopoly behavior, which leads to a lot of practical obstacles in the judicial practice of the civil action of anti-monopoly law. So there are many shortcomings to be improved. From the appearance and development of anti-monopoly law, the western developed countries have very successful experience, its concrete measure is to set up private litigation system in the implementation of anti-monopoly law. West The successful experience of our country in the private anti-monopoly law is worthy of our country's reference. It is urgent to perfect the civil litigation system of our country's anti-monopoly law as a reference copy of the western developed countries' anti-monopoly law. Based on the problems in the implementation of anti-monopoly law, this paper puts forward some suggestions for the perfection and improvement of anti-monopoly law in China.

This paper analyzes the problems in the implementation of China's anti-monopoly law, draws lessons from the successful experience of the western developed countries in the civil litigation system of anti-monopoly law, and discusses the social significance of perfecting the civil litigation system of the anti-monopoly law in China. It is suggested that in improving the legislation of antitrust civil action, we should adhere to the value orientation of legislation on safeguarding the interests of consumers, adhere to the principle of safeguarding social equity, take care of the weak position of the plaintiff, and perfect the civil litigation, and so on. Safeguard the legitimate interests of consumers and social public interests and promote social equity. The structure of the text is as follows:

Chapter 1 is the introduction. This chapter first introduces the background and significance of this paper, then summarizes the research results of domestic and foreign scholars about the civil action system of anti-monopoly law, and introduces the main contents and research methods of this paper. Finally, the paper briefly introduces the innovation and shortcomings of this paper.

The second chapter is the rationality and urgency of improving and perfecting the anti-monopoly civil action in our country. This chapter summarizes the legal tradition and the actual situation in the current implementation of anti-monopoly law, and analyzes the rationality and urgency of perfecting the civil action of anti-monopoly law in China.

Chapter 3 is the value orientation of our country's anti-monopoly civil action. First of all, it discusses that fair competition is the basic principle of market economy, and the starting point of civil litigation legislation of anti-monopoly law should adhere to the principle of fairness. At the same time, it discusses that the value target of civil action of anti-monopoly law should also be to improve the overall economic benefit and safeguard the interests of consumers.

Chapter 4 is the subject of anti-monopoly civil action. This part includes the identification of plaintiff qualification, public interest litigation, antitrust group action, in the analysis of the actual situation in the implementation of anti-monopoly law in China, learn from the successful experience of Western developed countries in the civil action of anti-monopoly law. To our country anti-monopoly law civil lawsuit consummation puts forward the proposal.