论文总字数：17939字

摘 要

为了使正义能够实现，也为了我国法治建设工作的推进，在司法工作中，首先要遵循的原则就是审判独立原则。审判独立原则是指通过法律赋予法官独立的法律地位，确保法官在审理案件时不受不合理因素的制约。这一原则加大了法官的权力，权力越大，腐败的可能性就越大。有权即应有责，权责应该相存并生，因此，为了避免法官滥用手中的司法权，针对法官群体，又创建了法官惩戒制度来进行约束。

本文首先介绍了法官惩戒制度的含义、在我国的确立、基本内容及其特殊性。然后从两方面对审判独立与法官惩戒的关系进行分析，笔者认为，审判独立是法官惩戒的基础，法官惩戒是审判独立的重要保证。最后对审判独立与法官惩戒关系的完善进行了探讨，首先对各自存在的问题进行分析并给出相应的解决措施。可见，审判独立和法官惩戒制度是相互促进、共同发展的。相信在不久的将来，如果我们持续推进建设，法官惩戒制度和审判独立一定能够相辅相成，发挥出更大的作用，并促进我国法治社会建设。

关键词 ：司法 审判独立 法官惩戒 公平正义

On Judicial Independence and Judge's Correction

Abstract

In order for justice to be realized and for the advancement of the construction of the rule of law in our country, the first principle to be followed in judicial work is the principle of judicial independence. The principle of trial independence refers to the independent legal status granted to judges by law, which ensures that judges are not subject to unreasonable factors when handling cases. This principle increases the power of judges. The greater the power, the greater the possibility of corruption. The right should be the responsibility, the powers and responsibilities should coexist. Therefore, in order to prevent the judges from abusing the judicial power in their hands, a judge disciplinary system was established to restrict the judge groups.

This article first introduced the meaning of the judicial disciplinary system, its establishment in China, its basic content and its particularity. Then the author analyzes the relationship between the independence of the trial and the punishment of the judge from two aspects. The author believes that the independence of the trial is the basis of the judge's punishment, and that the judge's punishment is an important guarantee for the trial independence. At last, the author discusses the perfection of the relationship between trial independence and the disciplinary action of judges. First of all, analyzes the existing problems and gives corresponding solutions. It can be seen that the independence of the trial and the disciplinary system of judges are mutually reinforcing and common development. It is believed that in the near future, if we continue to promote construction, the judicial disciplinary system and trial independence will surely complement each other, play a greater role, and promote the construction of a society under the rule of law in China.

Key Words: Judicial; Trial independent; Judge disciplinary; Justice and fairness

目 录

中文摘要 I

英文摘要 II

引言 1

一、 法官惩戒制度概述 2

（一）内涵与历史 2

1. 含义 2

2. 在我国的缘起 2

（二） 内容 3

1. 惩戒事由是惩戒制度的核心内容 3

2. 主体和客体是惩戒制度的基本内容 4

3. 合理的惩戒程序是惩戒制度的重要内容 5

（三） 法官惩戒的特殊性——与行政处分的区别 5

1. 权力的性质不同 5

2. 作出决定的机关不同 6

3. 决定的程序不同 6

二、 审判独立与法官惩戒的关系 7

（一）审判独立是法官惩戒的基础 7

1. 审判独立 7

2. 审判独立是设计法官惩戒制度的前提 7

（二）法官惩戒是审判独立的保证 8

1. 完善的法官惩戒制度有利于提高司法公信力 8

2. 完善的法官惩戒制度有利于保护法官的权益 9

三、审判独立与法官惩戒关系的完善 10

（一）审判独立的完善 10

1. 外界阻力及其完善措施 10

2. 内部问题及其完善措施 12

（二）法官惩戒制度的完善 13

1. 制定权威的立法依据，确保惩戒主体具备中立性 13

2. 统一惩戒标准，规范惩戒程序 14

结语 16

参考文献 17

致谢 19

引言

毋庸置疑，在实现法治社会的建设道路上，审判独立是必不可少的。审判独立原则源于近代西方资产阶级革命，直至现代，该原则已经日益发展完善。因其符合司法权的运行机制和社会公平正义的价值取向，所以被国际社会普遍接受。不可否认，在一个国家，法律要想被真正有效地贯彻实施，就必须先建立起审判独立的先决条件，如此，法治社会方有实现的可能，我国也不例外。目前，我国正在大力推进建设法治社会，当然也全力主张审判独立。

请支付后下载全文，论文总字数：17939字