2020届英文翻译

题 目: 新时期政府购买服务中政府与社会组织的关系分析

英文原文

The Relationship Analysis between Government and Social Organization in Government Purchases of Services in the New Era

Abstract

Government purchase of services as a diversified way to provide social services, which has been raised to an important position in social development in the new era of our country, country has gradually opened the government purchases of services since 2014. Social organization as one of the important participants that government-oriented social services provided, how to build a harmonious relationship with the government will be an important issue. Learning from government and social relations established by Western society in the early days of the government purchase of services, but many contradictions and conflicts are exposed in the specific practice, such as non-separation between government and society, no lawful regulations and lack of trust, etc., this acclimatized phenomenon should be attributed to running-in reaction of western theory in the early days of localization. However, this contradiction and conflict between government and society will exist for a long time, but as far as the future development trend of government purchases of social services with Chinese characteristics, the regulations and mutual trust will be perfected and established in the development, and the dependence relations of social organization for the government will be strengthened.

1. Introduction

As a newly emerging governance tool, the government purchases of services from social organization has been widely used by many capitalist developed countries since the 1970s through the sweeping of global association revolution and revolution and cooperative governance. However, government purchases of services from social organization are still in the exploratory stage in Chinas new era, in practice, the prevalence of lack of legal protection, supervision and management is not enough, capital budget is unstable, purchase of service is small-scale, the purchase process is not standardized, responsibility becomes formalistic and other problems. As the carrier of public power, our government plays a central role in the governance field of public affairs for a long time. The government has not completely jumped out of the traditional system of 'omnipotent government' in governance transition; there are the function transfers not in place, the power boundaries are not clear and so on; social organization as the carrier of social forces, the overall development is not perfect, the ability is to be improved, it is difficult to find a suitable positioning in cooperative relationship with highly unreasonable resource dependence, and achieve healthy development. A truly systematic, scientific, normative and effective government purchase of services from social organizations is far from established. The characteristics of relationship between government and society based on government purchase of services are analyzed in this paper currently, in order to provide some suggestions and reference for the long-term development of government purchases of services.

2. Relationship Construction between Government and Social Organization in the Government Purchases of Services

First, we need to clear the definition of government purchases of services. Government purchases of services are that government takes a certain amount of funds in budget involved in public social welfare, set a standard service evaluation system, under the premise of government and social organizationrsquo; communication, consultation and cooperation, the service items were originally provided by the government directly which in order to improve peoples daily life and promote the International Conference on Economics and Management, Education, Humanities and Social Sciences ,good development, and give the social organizations which provide public services to complete through open tender, directed commission and inviting bid form. At the same time, the government and the social organization signed a certain contract, in the case that legal protect the relationship between the two sides,according to the quality and quantity of services provided by the social organizations, the government pay the cost of services. This can be summarized as a 'governmental funding, targeted purchase, contract management, cash evaluation' public service supply mode.

3. Multiple Characteristics of Relationship between Government and Society in Government Purchases of Services in the New Era

This idealized relationship between government and society has exposed many contradictions and conflicts in social practice of the new era:

(1) Non-separation between government and society, government-oriented, society comply, external promotion, internal cooperation

In the traditional social management mechanism, there is serious offside and misplaced phenomenon in the social function of the government, which makes the government play the policy maker, the practice organizer, the service provider and the referee of the problem and other contradictory roles meantime in the social construction. At present, the process of administrative system reform is slow in our country, the transfor

剩余内容已隐藏，支付完成后下载完整资料

2020届英文翻译

题 目: 新时期政府购买服务中政府与社会组织的关系分析

英文原文

The Relationship Analysis between Government and Social Organization in Government Purchases of Services in the New Era

Abstract

Government purchase of services as a diversified way to provide social services, which has been raised to an important position in social development in the new era of our country, country has gradually opened the government purchases of services since 2014. Social organization as one of the important participants that government-oriented social services provided, how to build a harmonious relationship with the government will be an important issue. Learning from government and social relations established by Western society in the early days of the government purchase of services, but many contradictions and conflicts are exposed in the specific practice, such as non-separation between government and society, no lawful regulations and lack of trust, etc., this acclimatized phenomenon should be attributed to running-in reaction of western theory in the early days of localization. However, this contradiction and conflict between government and society will exist for a long time, but as far as the future development trend of government purchases of social services with Chinese characteristics, the regulations and mutual trust will be perfected and established in the development, and the dependence relations of social organization for the government will be strengthened.

1. Introduction

As a newly emerging governance tool, the government purchases of services from social organization has been widely used by many capitalist developed countries since the 1970s through the sweeping of global association revolution and revolution and cooperative governance. However, government purchases of services from social organization are still in the exploratory stage in Chinas new era, in practice, the prevalence of lack of legal protection, supervision and management is not enough, capital budget is unstable, purchase of service is small-scale, the purchase process is not standardized, responsibility becomes formalistic and other problems. As the carrier of public power, our government plays a central role in the governance field of public affairs for a long time. The government has not completely jumped out of the traditional system of 'omnipotent government' in governance transition; there are the function transfers not in place, the power boundaries are not clear and so on; social organization as the carrier of social forces, the overall development is not perfect, the ability is to be improved, it is difficult to find a suitable positioning in cooperative relationship with highly unreasonable resource dependence, and achieve healthy development. A truly systematic, scientific, normative and effective government purchase of services from social organizations is far from established. The characteristics of relationship between government and society based on government purchase of services are analyzed in this paper currently, in order to provide some suggestions and reference for the long-term development of government purchases of services.

2. Relationship Construction between Government and Social Organization in the Government Purchases of Services

First, we need to clear the definition of government purchases of services. Government purchases of services are that government takes a certain amount of funds in budget involved in public social welfare, set a standard service evaluation system, under the premise of government and social organizationrsquo; communication, consultation and cooperation, the service items were originally provided by the government directly which in order to improve peoples daily life and promote the International Conference on Economics and Management, Education, Humanities and Social Sciences ,good development, and give the social organizations which provide public services to complete through open tender, directed commission and inviting bid form. At the same time, the government and the social organization signed a certain contract, in the case that legal protect the relationship between the two sides,according to the quality and quantity of services provided by the social organizations, the government pay the cost of services. This can be summarized as a 'governmental funding, targeted purchase, contract management, cash evaluation' public service supply mode.

3. Multiple Characteristics of Relationship between Government and Society in Government Purchases of Services in the New Era

This idealized relationship between government and society has exposed many contradictions and conflicts in social practice of the new era:

(1) Non-separation between government and society, government-oriented, society comply, external promotion, internal cooperation

In the traditional social management mechanism, there is serious offside and misplaced phenomenon in the social function of the government, which makes the government play the policy maker, the practice organizer, the service provider and the referee of the problem and other contradictory roles meantime in the social construction. At present, the process of administrative system reform is slow in our country, the transfor

剩余内容已隐藏，支付完成后下载完整资料

资料编号：[255282]，资料为PDF文档或Word文档，PDF文档可免费转换为Word