附件1：外文资料翻译原文

Suburban Governance in Global Perspective

Roger Keil, Pierre Hamel

《Urban Planning International》，2015（6）：7-12

Abstract: A large literature explicitly investigates how urban regions are governed. Immigration policies, housing, infrastructure, transportation and development processes contribute to the process of governance. However, much less attention has been paid to the question of suburban governance; specifically the constellation of public and private processes, actors and institutions that determine and shape the planning, design, politics and economics of suburban spaces and everyday behaviour. At the same time, any survey of the existing literature would reveal that it is exceedingly difficult to pin down exactly what suburban governance means and how it is practiced. The array of descriptors across different geographical and linguistic areas makes the task of ascertaining similar and different modes of suburban governance difficult yet still a necessary project. Given the worldwide spread of the phenomenon of peripheral urbanization, this task has to be taken on at the scale of global comparative research. Thus, our aim in this article is to develop a framework, and argument that accounts for the universalization of suburbanization, while maintaining a focus on the particular manifestations of this global process. It is true that different descriptors of suburban life signify particular forms of decentralized urban space. Yet behind all of these forms of suburbs are the processes of urbanization and suburbanization that signify our move towards a completely urbanized global society.

Keywords:Suburbanization; Suburbanism; Governance; Global Suburbs

Introduction: The suburb governs the machine-made theory frame

At present, had the massive literature government to the urban region to conduct the deep research. The land settlement policy, housing, the infrastructure, transportation as well as the urban development process constituted one part of urban government. Regardless is the urban regime theory, the growth alliance, the rules and regulations theory, the new regionalism and regional science, the urban society movement promotes to the region criterion, for us understood how the urban region plans and establishes in the theory resources that under various political tensities develops. However, the suburb governs this subject little to attach great importance, particularly decides and affects the plan, design, political and financial circumstance and daily behavior suburb space a series of public and private processes and participation main bodies and organization. Certainly, the different scholar and city (suburb) area critic already has carried on the exploration to the suburb space regulation and suburbanization advancement. But, is clear in view of discussion of government is actually few. The literature that at present published indicated that very difficult gives the accurate definition and explanation to the suburb government and implementation. The different region and use different languages area also lets the exploration suburb administrative mode when the different glossary that describing the suburb uses the similarities and differences becomes very difficult. But this research still very much had the necessity. Especially in view of the fact that the urban fringe areas urbanized phenomenon is getting more and more common in the world, this research must globally carry on using the method of comparative study.

Therefore, this article is for the purpose of creating a frame for suburb government, explained that the suburbanization universal tendency, and focuses in the concrete manifestation of suburbanization globally development. Indeed, the different local description suburb lifes keyword is different, and truly has represented various concrete forms of dispersed city space. But these forms the behind is the process of urbanized and suburbanization, or is the facilitation completely urbanization society that Lefebrve proposed “urban revolution”. Lefebrve is focuses on the concept that 50 years ago put forward the future, has the challenging supposition. At that time and Indian the urbanization of world population great nation including Chinese rate was very low, but in the urbanized degree highest Europe and North American area, had not realized “urban society”. After one generation, this situation changes. China and India are experiencing the rapid urbanized development, Africa is also so. The globalization of new non-monopoly capitalism further intensified the urban space the generalization and decentralization in global criterion. Viewpoint that just like Lefebrve proposed, daily life aspects and cities “space” also therefore is just having the great change. In addition, in some sense, not only in the world had to be over half the population to live in the urban environment, the complete urbanization that Lefebrve predicted even also and region outside to city the population is having the influence. The urban society is molding the different function landscape around the world, serves, and is connecting the global each corners cities and villages.

However, urbanization processs form is actually various. Lefebrve once mentioned that cohesion and outside expanding two city growth forms, the two will cause the centralization and magnification of city separately, but, regardless of being the people moves to the city from the urban fringe, will be moved to the urban region by the countryside for the first time, the urban fringe area will exhibit specially obvious trend of development. The latter kind of migration is the distinct characteristic of transnational immigration, but also includes in certain countries the population to continue from the countryside to the situation of urban migration. Non-balanced development, accumulation of capital, population migrati

剩余内容已隐藏，支付完成后下载完整资料

英语原文共 4 页，剩余内容已隐藏，支付完成后下载完整资料

资料编号：[150577]，资料为PDF文档或Word文档，PDF文档可免费转换为Word